RonRolheiser,OMI

Our Greed Pulls The Trigger

It is getting to be frightening to watch the news. Terrorism is everywhere, and daily we appear less capable of protecting ourselves against it. Still fresh in our minds is the recent hijacking of the TWA jet by Lebanese Shiites, but that was merely one incident, resulting in just one death. Terrorism itself is spreading like a mushroom cloud, ominous, out of anyone’s control, a new kind of ultimate threat.

Lebanese shiites, Palestinian nationalists, Irish IRA extremists, Indian Sikhs, Central American death squads, Italian Red Brigades, German Baader-Meinhof gangs, Spanish Basque Nationalists, Filipino insurrectionists, Iranian extremists, Tamil separatists and their Sri Lankan counterparts, all of these groups bomb, kill, kidnap, and deal death and terror daily. This is not to mention hundreds of other groups, less internationally prominent, who do the same. Then there is still the isolated terrorist, the guy who goes berserk and shoots himself and his family, or who shoots people indiscriminately at bus stops or at a San Diego MacDonald’s. Violence of this kind is always wrong and we are right to be angry. But we are not right when we naively believe that terrorism is the work of a small number of sick and deranged persons. Too common, and spreading, is the belief that if a few Ayatollahs, Khadafys could be eliminated, then all would be peaceful. Terrorism, in this view, is seen as the product of individual fanaticism, a small accident of history, the product of isolated and deranged minds.

But terrorism is the natural by-product of our present way of life and the economic and social system upon which we depend. Like pollution, breakdown of relationships, sexual promiscuity, economic greed and high blood pressure, it is the inevitable result of a world structured like our own. As Russell Baker puts it, it is “one of the many embarrassing by-products of our blessings.” Bottom-line, our way of life is based too much upon greed. We live believing that whatever we can attain, providing it is done lawfully, is ours by right and that the accumulation of excess is itself a sign of success. Everything within our culture exalts that idea and thus greed, like cancer, continues to grow. Crassly put, we try to suck as much out of life as we can get. The fact that others get less, are weak or have less access to the good life is not important. Then, after we have what we want, we want peace, we want to be protected, we feel enraged that anyone would dare take from us what is ours. But the problem is that we took from someone else and we are taking more than our share. There can be no peace without justice. Terrorism flows from that. As violent, frightening, morally abhorrent and wrong as it is, it is a voice of the poor; perhaps, at times, the only voice they’ve got left.

Because of this, our response to terrorism must be both compassionate and nuanced. Our reaction, in fact, must include resistance. The demands of terrorism should not be met and all precautions should be taken to prevent it. But such measures, while demanded in the short range, must be sharply dissociated from our natural instinct to silence terrorism by brute force, namely, by revenge, by brutal retribution, by counter violence and by excessively increasing security, police and security measures. Frightening in this regard is the stunning popularity of the movie Rambo, a film about terrorism which crassly depicts the triumph of good over evil in terms of a superman counteracting terrorists by brutally crushing them. The popularity of this film (not the least of whose fans is Ronald Reagan) shows how deeply engrained is the feeling that the roots of terrorism lie within a few very wicked people and that the answer to terrorism is simply to eliminate those few. Frightening, too, is the idea that our crushing of those few amounts to the triumph of good over evil. Rambo could be a good film, if there were justice in the world. As it is, it feeds what’s worst in us.

Terrorism may never be stopped by brute force. Perverse as this may sound, it has too many moral roots. It stems ultimately from injustice.  Moreover, it can never be stopped by brute force. Terrorism will stop only when the poor are given enough to live for, so that they do not need to give up their lives in suicidal martyrdom. Terrorism will stop only when the poor have another voice that is actually heard. Terrorism will stop only when peace is secured on justice. None of these will happen if our present greed continues. As long as we feel we have a right to milk from life as much as we can take, we will always live in fear, in a fragile peace.

Longing Is Our Spiritual Lot

On Feb. 12, 1944, 13-year-old Anne Frank wrote the following words in her now-famous diary. “Today the sun is shining, the sky is a deep blue, there is a lovely breeze and I am longing-so longing-for everything. To talk, for freedom, for friends, to be alone.

“And I do so long…to cry! I feel as if I am going to burst, and I know that it would get better with crying; but I can’t, I’m restless, I go from room to room, breathe through the crack of a closed window, feel my heart beating, as if it is saying, ‘can’t you satisfy my longing at last?’

“I believe that it is spring within me, I feel that spring is awakening, I feel it in my whole body and soul. It is an effort to behave normally, I feel utterly confused. I don’t know what to read, what to write, what to do, I only know that I am longing.”

There is in all of us, at the very centre of our lives, a tension, an aching, a burning in the heart that is insatiable, non-quietable and very deep. Sometimes, we experience this longing as focused on a person, particularly if we are in a love that is not consummated. Other times, we experience this yearning as a longing to attain something. Most often, though, it is a longing without a clear name or focus, an aching that cannot be clearly pinpointed or described. Like Anne Frank, we only know that we are restless, full of disquiet, aching at a level that we cannot seem to get at.

When we look into history, philosophy, poetry, mysticism and literature, we see an astonishing variety of ways in which this aching is expressed.

For instance, many of us have read Richard Bach’s little parable, Jonathan Livingston Seagull. This book spoke deeply to millions of people. It is a very simple story: Jonathan is a seagull who, when he comes to consciousness, is not satisfied with being a seagull.

He looks at his life, and the lives of other seagulls, and he finds it too small: “All a seagull ever does is eat and fight!” So Jonathan tries to burst out.

He tries to fly higher, to fly faster, to do anything that might break the asphyxiating limits of being a seagull. He doesn’t know what he wants, he only knows that he is hopelessly restless, that he must break out.

Many times he crashes and almost kills himself, but he keeps trying.

This is a story obviously more of the human heart than of a seagull. It describes our search, our aching, our congenital propensity for the limitless, the free, the total embrace.

In more abstract ways, this has been expressed in history: Philosophers speak of “a desire of the part to return to the whole”; mystics speak of “the spark of the divine in us”; the ancient Greeks spoke of something they called “NOSTOS,” homesickness (a feeling of never being at home, even when you are at home).

The Vikings called it “wanderlust,” the insatiable need to push further and further into the horizon; Shakespeare talked of “immortal longings”; G.M. Hopkins called the human spirit “an imprisoned skylark”; Augustine prayed to God: “You have made us for yourself, Lord, and our hearts are restless until they rest in you”; E.E. Cummings, poet, once said: “For every mile the feet go, the heart goes nine.”

All of these feelings are in all of us. We are all deeply and hopelessly erotic and “dis”-eased, incapable in this life of finding lasting rest. This restlessness, however, must never be seen as something which sets us against what is spiritual, religious and of God.

In fact, this hopeless aching and lack of ease is the very basis of the spiritual life. What we do with the eros inside of us, be it heroic or perverse, is our spiritual life.

The tragedy is that so many persons, full of riches and bursting with life, see this drive as something which is essentially irreligious, as something which sets them against what is spiritual. Nothing could be further from the truth. Our erotic impulses are God’s lure in us. They are our spirit!

We experience them precisely as “spirit,” as soul, as that which makes us more than mere animals.

Our soul is not an invisible kind of tissue floating around within us, that stains when we sin and cleanses when we are in grace and which ultimately floats away from the body after death. Our soul is our eros, our minds and hearts in their deep restlessness.

Living the tension that arises out of that is the spiritual life. In that sense, everyone has a spiritual life – either a good one or a destructive one. Our spirits make it impossible for us to be static, we must move outside of ourselves.

That movement outward (which is experienced as a double tension: a hunger which drives us outward and an attractive outside person or object which draws us outward) is either beneficial to us or destructive. When it is beneficial, we have a good spiritual life; when it is destructive, we have a bad one.

It is important, therefore, that we do not identify the spiritual life with something which is exotic (for religious fanatics), extraordinary (for professional contemplatives), or as something which is not for those who are full-blooded and full of eros.

It is non-negotiable. If you are alive, you are restless, full of spirit. What you do with that spirit, is your spiritual life.

Staring Chaos In The Face

We live in pain and division. In the world, in the church and within ourselves, there is much anger, hatred and bitterness. It seems ever harder to live at peace with each other, to be calm, to have simple joy within our lives and to not alienate someone just by being.  Within ourselves, despite the fact that we have virtually every practical reason to be happy – friends, health, material affluence – we experience anger, jealousy and woundedness. Seldom are we satisfied. Seldom are we truly free of bitterness, anger and feelings of being slighted and overlooked. Very seldom are we fully at peace with life and with others.

Beyond this, we live in a world that is full of painful division. It has its own wounds. Poverty, social injustice, the inequality of women, racism, abortion, sexual exploitation, narcissistic yuppies, untrustworthy political leaders, and simply millions and millions of persons caught up in excessive self-interest. It is hard for us, as adults in our world, to simply love, be understanding, and be at peace with others and with life. We are wounded, within and without. The temptation is towards bitterness, anger, withdrawal and paranoia. That is the road to hell because bitterness is hell.

What is needed to stop our slide toward this is reconciliation, at every level. What is reconciliation? It is reality that admits many levels. Here I want to speak of reconciliation as personal healing, as a coming inside of ourselves to a new wholeness and a renewed sense of childlike joy. Reconciliation, at this level, involves many things. First of all, it involves the recognition of our woundedness, our neuroses, our bitterness, our narcissism and narrow loyalties, and simply of our lack of joy. Just as for an alcoholic there can be no real change before there is the basic admittance of the condition of helplessness and need, so, too, in our struggle to come to personal healing. There can be no healing until we admit sickness. And we are ill: compulsive, angry, competitive, bitter, narcissistic, cynical, humorless, paranoid, self-pitying, jealous, sombre and joyless.

The roots of this woundedness stretch deep into our past, and beyond our past into the history of the world. We are not just part of the chain of love, but are likewise part of the chain of neuroses and wound that stretches back, ultimately, to Adam and Eve. We can sometimes point to certain events and persons that have hurt us deeply and blame much of our pain on them. However, these events and persons themselves point still further back to distant events and persons that wounded them. There was some original sin – and life has not been harmonious, nor seemed fair, ever since.

Reconciliation begins when we truly admit this. So long as we pretend otherwise, it is not even meaningful to use the word. When we claim our woundedness, however, we are brought face to face with our own helplessness, our need, our need for God. Then, as Henri Nouwen puts it, our hearts “become the place where the tears of God and the tears of God’s children can merge and become tears of hope.” (Love in a Fearful Land, Page 93) The first step in real reconciliation is the tearful acknowledgement of our woundedness, our helplessness, our sin. In this admission is a painful dying and a joyous rebirth.

Ashes make the best fertilizer. Tears wash away sin. Honesty induces the labor that gives birth to conversion. When we cry honest tears, we are flooded with the desire to pray, to forgive, to serve others, to build a just social order, to live more moral lives, to love beyond resentment and bitterness. That is the movement toward reconciliation and joy. Why? Because searing honesty brings us face to face with our own woundedness and helplessness; our helplessness, in turn, brings us face to face with a redeeming God. In that encounter, we learn that we are loved sinners. Gratitude is born. A genuine sanctity follows.

Novelist Iris Murdoch once stated that to be a saint is nothing less than to be warmed and vitalized by gratitude. Gratitude is the key to all. We come to personal healing and to reconciliation with others to the exact extent that we are warmed and vitalized by gratitude. To rid ourselves of resentment, bitterness, jealousy and paranoia requires a powerful fire. Only the gratitude that flows from knowing that we are loved, loved despite wound and sin, is a large enough flame to burn wound from our lives. The rest follows: When we are vitalized by gratitude we will automatically move toward deeper prayer, wider loyalties and a more embracing heart. Reconciliation begins when we stare our chaos in the face. In that, we will be brought face to face with our helplessness and our need for God. Prayer will then begin, crying out from the very depths of our being. We will be laid bare and will realize that we are loved sinners, in solidarity with other loved sinners like ourselves. Gratitude, reconciliation and healing will follow.

Saints For Complex People

“I was born into this world with a tortured sensitivity. For long I have puzzled over the causes of my psychological anguish.” Thus writes Ruth Burrows, the British Carmelite, in the opening lines of her autobiography, “Before the Living God.” Reading her autobiography and her spiritual writings has been, for me, a very consoling experience. Here is a lady of tortured sensitivity, of near pathological complexity, a person who has struggled through years of anguish to arrive eventually at the single-mindedness that constitutes Christian sanctity. Reading her story gave me hope. If a person of her temperament can achieve single-mindedness, there is hope for the rest of us. Her story also sparked other reflections:

Soren Kierkegaard once wrote that to be a saint is “to will one thing.” He is correct, but that makes sanctity a difficult task for those of us who, by nature and temperament, are complex and sensitive. Christian sanctity lies in single-mindedness. Unfortunately, that tends to be identified with non-complexity. Books on spirituality, past and present, tend to present an ideal which is simplistic and alienating for many people. The impression is given that to be spiritual is to be uncomplex, not restless, not torn by deep conflicts, contradictions, yearnings, doubts and erotic lures so that faith, commitment and single-mindedness become a painful heroism. We see this clearly, for instance, in most books on the lives of the saints.

Many times when I have finished reading or hearing about the life of a saint, or someone else that is being held up to me as a model to imitate, I find myself asking: Didn’t this person have any struggles? Were they never torn by complexity and doubt? Did they never have romantic heartaches and earthly pulls which made their choices for God and service pained and tearful? Did they never succumb to self-pity and believe Kazantzakis’ words that “virtue sits completely alone on top of a desolate ledge. Through her mind pass all the forbidden pleasures which she has never tasted – and she weeps”? (N. Kazantzakis, St. Francis, Page 139)

French phenomenologist, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, once explained that he was an atheist because ambiguity is the fundamental phenomenological fact within existence and belief in God denies one this experience. That is a sophisticated way of saying: “Life is too complex to fit into the simplistic schemae of spirituality.” Most of us have never read Merleau-Ponty, but most of us have felt the resistance he talks about. Like his, our hearts, too, resist an ideal that seems too simplistic to incorporate our full experience. Spirituality says it is simple while everything inside of us screams that it is complex.

We need saints for the complex, saints who start their stories like Ruth Burrows and then chronicle how a complex, tortured and divided heart can eventually come to “will one thing.” Looking into the spectrum of contemporary Christian spirituality, I see examples of writers who are trying to do this: Ruth Burrows, Thomas Merton, Henri Nouwen, Jim Wallis, among others. None of these present themselves as an ideal to emulate, but their writings give hope to those of us who are complex and struggling because at the heart of their message is their own struggle to bring a divided heart to a single-mindedness in Christ. In their words, I find consolation and new hope. Thus, for example, Burrows writes:

“I was left, it seems, struggling with the misery of my temperament and yet, thanks in a great part to a loving home, gradually choosing to do right. Inevitably, I would seek to escape from the drab misery of my life as I experienced it by living in a world of fantasy, and yet I was made to realize the falsity of this activity and renounce it. No one instructed me in this. No one understood me enough to counsel me…

“I have spoken of the strong romantic elements in my nature. It is true that this can lead to unreality but it can likewise lead to truth. In my case, it was a profound dissatisfaction with life. I was looking beyond and above, waiting for the secret door to open, waiting for the beloved to appear and transform my life. I tended to approach life with intense expectancy, wanting to extract from it the last ounce of sweetness, only to be bitterly disappointed, finding it insipid if not downright sour…

“I have known doubt, tearing anxiety to a frightful degree. For nearly 30 years, I have groped in darkness.” (Before the Living God, Page 3 and 31)

Nouwen writes of his struggles:

“Indeed, how divided my heart has been and still is! I want to love God, but also to make a career. I want to be a good Christian, but also to have my successes as a teacher, preacher or speaker. I want to be a saint, but also enjoy the sensations of the sinner. I want to be close to Christ but also popular and liked by many people. No wonder that living becomes a tiring enterprise.” (The Gensee Diary, Page 59)

Or again:

“I crave personal attention and affection. The life in a parish suddenly strikes me as cool, mechanical and routine. I desire friendship, a moment of personal attention, a little interest in my individual experiences…The fact that my feelings are so general and touch practically everything I see, hear and do, shows I am dealing with a genuine depression…”(H. Nouwen, I Gracious!, Page 131)

For those of us with a tortured complexity, words like these bring comfort and challenge, for they show both the ideal of Christian spirituality – to will one thing – and the struggles of the complex heart in trying to do that.

Easter Arsonists Of The Heart

Theologian-poet, John Shea, once commented on the resurrection appearances of Jesus:

            “On the road that escapes Jerusalem

            and winds along the ridge to Emmaus

            two disillusioned youths

            drag home their crucified dream.

            “They had smelled messiah in the air

            and rose to the scarred and ancient hope

            only to mourn what might have been.

            And now a sudden stranger falls upon their loss

            with excited words about mustard seeds

            and surprises hidden at the heart of death

            and that evil must be kissed upon the lips

            and that every scream is redeemed for it echoes

            in the ear of God and do you not understand

            what died upon the cross was fear.

            “They protested their right to despair but he said,

            ‘My Father’s laughter fills the silence of the tomb.’

            Because they did not understand, they offered him food.

            And in the breaking of the bread

            they knew the impostor for who he was –

            the arsonist of the heart.”

                                                            –The Hour of the Unexpected

The resurrection of Christ challenges us to new life – to believe, precisely, that there are surprises hidden at the heart of death: that every scream, tear and cry is redeemed, and that God’s laughter is stronger than death. Ultimately, belief in the resurrection asks us to believe that, despite a strong experience to the contrary, reality is gracious, light does triumph over darkness, love over self-interest, justice over oppression, peace over chaos, fulfilment over hunger. Faith in the resurrection is the trust that, in the end, everything is good.

But it is hard, almost impossible, to believe that. Why? Because experience constantly belies it. At least, so it seems. Despair comes easier than faith. Too often self-interest, loneliness, oppression, greed, bitterness and darkness triumph in our world. It seems naive not to believe that they represent our Omega, our final unresurrected, non-redeemed destiny. The disciples of Jesus, themselves, experienced a lot of doubt, even on the original Easter Sunday. They, like us, were mourning crucified dreams.

What reversed this? What moved them from despair to new hope?

It was not just the fact of the resurrection that changed them, for they doubted, huddled in fear, locked doors, despaired and tried to go back to their old ways of life even after they had seen the empty tomb. What brought resurrection faith was the in-the-flesh appearance of the resurrected Christ. Slowly, gently, through these appearances, Christ built up their faith until they no longer needed these appearances. We are built up in faith through appearances of Christ in the flesh. Where does the resurrected Christ have flesh in our world?

The resurrected Christ appears to us in the flesh in those persons who are arsonists of the heart, who truly make our hears burn within us. What kind of persons burn messianic holes within us? Those who speak of mustard seeds, who tell us about the value of what’s hidden, small and insignificant; those who tell us that pain can bring deep meaning and redemption; those who tell us that, despite all, reality is gracious and we can trust and love. They are those who tell us that we should be less afraid, that paranoia is an illness, metanoia is salvation; who tell us that bitterness is not noble, it’s hell, that cynicism and stoicism are forms of despair, that life is not tragic, that tears are redemptive, that the Christian call is to celebration.

They are those who tell us that it is not too late for us, that there is still plenty of time to live anew, to become what we were meant to be, beyond self-interest. They are those who tell us to make merry and dance, for all is well. These kinds of words stir what’s best within us, burn holes in us, stir faith, roll stones back from tombs, show us the resurrected Christ in the flesh.

And that flesh always looks ordinary. The arsonist of the heart invariably looks like someone we know, an ordinary somebody, like the resurrected Christ in his appearances – a gardener, a cook, a stranger.  It is interesting to speculate as to why the disciples so often didn’t recognize Christ after the resurrection. After all, he had only been dead for a day and a half when he first appeared. Yet Mary Magdala, who surely knew him well, took him for a gardener. Later, on the road and on the shore, his disciples took him to be a stranger, then a cook. Only in the breaking of the bread did they recognize him as the Christ.

That is why as we journey together, mourning so many of our crucified dreams, we would do well to be attentive to what causes arson in the heart. We should learn to look more closely at each other’s faces during the breaking of the bread.

Keep Your Faith In Balance

I share with you here four tales of imbalance. Each is the story of a person who is sincere, Christian and dedicated, but has fallen from wholeness. From these stories of imbalance, hopefully, we will be able to see where proportion lies.

A tale of the neglect of social justice: A bishop I know recounts this story. One day, he received a phone call from an angry lady: “Why,” she demanded, “are you and the other bishops so hung up on social justice? Why don’t you stick with what the church is all about, liturgy, prayer and morality?” He answered her with another question: “What would you do, if you were a bishop and someone called you and said: ‘Our parish priest refuses to preach about private prayer and private morality. He tells us that these are fads that a few contemplatives have started. They are not important in the Christian life?’” “I would suspend the man on the spot!” was her reply. “Then,” replied the bishop, “what am I to do with a person who phones and says: ‘Our priest refuses to preach social justice. He tells us that this is just a fad started by the liberation theologians and a few social-justice types. You can be a good Christian and never practice social justice?’” This lady’s question betrays a dangerous imbalance: Spirituality is reduced to prayer and private morality. As important as these are, they are not enough.

A tale of the neglect of prayer and private morality: Some years back while doing graduate work, I was working as a chaplain at a hostel in a poorer section of San Francisco. One of the persons I was working with, a very dedicated person, once said to me: “Father, do you really think God gives a damn whether you say your morning and evening prayers, whether you hold a grudge, or whether you hop in and out of bed a few times with someone you aren’t married to? These small, private things are so unimportant. “What possible difference do they make in the light of the larger questions of peace and justice? God hasn’t got time for our private little prayers and little moral struggles!” For him, spirituality meant the struggle for peace and justice, the taking care of God’s poor. Just that. Private prayer and private morality were so dwarfed by these larger issues so as to be seen as unimportant. As important as is the struggle for peace and justice, being a prophet implies more.

A tale of the neglect of joy and celebration: Two years ago, I attended an international conference in Belgium on local church which brought together people from all parts of the world. On the second-last day of the conference, the organizers called a halt to work, to all the discussing and theologizing. We were all sent off to the beautiful city of Brugges for tours, cocktails, dining and celebrating. In my own group was a young nun from the Third World. There was no doubt that she was a woman who prayed, whose private morals were beyond suspicion, and that her whole life was being lived for the poor. But she struggled, and deeply, to be joyful, to celebrate, and not to be angry and bitter. She found our half-day celebration a tough chore, an evil to be endured, a waste of time and an insult to the poor. Again, I submit, there is here an imbalance. What is lacking from this lady’s life? Certainly not prayer, private morality or a preferential option for the poor. What’s lacking is friendship, celebration and the greatest asceticism of all, that of being a joyful, celebrating and non-bitter person. Prophetic witness lies as much in being a happy and non-bitter person as it does in being a person of prayer, morality and social justice; though, admittedly, the former is based a lot on the latter.

A tale of the neglect of love: Recently, after delivering a talk on prophecy, a lady challenged me: “You spoke too little about anger! You were too soft. Prophecy is all about challenge, anger and righteousness. Without a proper anger, you cannot be prophetic!” She said more, mostly about the need for anger and a bitter challenge to the mainstream culture. Again, at least in her challenge to me, there was imbalance. She spoke constantly of anger, of challenge, of criticalness. Never once did she mention love. Her attitude towards the culture was that of disdain, bitterness, anger and disgust. Nowhere in her did I detect compassion, sadness, sympathy and love towards those, or about those, she was supposedly preaching to.

A prophet, as Jim Wallis suggests, is always characterized more by love than by anger. Likewise, as psychology points out, we can only truly challenge another to change if that other first feels loved by us. There are certain non-negotiable prongs within Christian spirituality – namely, prayer and private morality, a commitment to justice and peace, the discipline of joy and celebration, (i.e. the Christian duty to be a happy person), and the duty to challenge by love.

And the key to health is proportion.

Living In Joy Is Hard Work!

Perhaps the most demanding asceticism within life is the discipline of joy. Rarely is this recognized. For most of us, the word joy itself rings superficial. It speaks of empty victory celebrations, mindlessness, lack of full awareness, naiveté and lack of depth. There is a cynical adultness in our reaction to joy: “If you knew better, if you were fully awake, you wouldn’t be this happy!”

Mary Gordon captures this excellently in her novel, Final Payments. She describes her feelings upon entering a room in which some university students were having a party: “I would look among the faces of the students for a face I could love. I would look for something original, something arresting in the shape of the chin or in the eyes, something that suggested the belief that there was residual pain that could not be touched by legislation. But they all looked so relentlessly happy and healthy that they did not interest me. I realized I was looking for someone who was sad, and I was angry at myself for making the equation, my faith’s equation, the church’s equation, between suffering and value.” (Final Payments, Page 139)  There is, too often, an equation, in the church and in the world in general, between depth and heaviness, joy and superficiality. This is a curious, but understandable, algebra.

Former Christian spiritualities tended to focus on the incompleteness of life…We live “mourning and weeping in this valley of tears.” There was great strength, and some real wisdom, in that. It gave people permission to cry, to taste life’s bitterness without feeling that there was something fundamentally wrong with them, and it helped people accept the truth that in this life all symphonies must remain unfinished. In this way, it helped stem frustration and allowed people to suffer the martyrdom of an incomplete and inconsummate life more calmly and heroically. But from saying that life will always be incomplete and full of inevitable pain, it is an easy, though false, step to affirm that therefore depth and maturity lie in being heavy, grim and stoic. Unfortunately, that has often happened and Christian asceticism has too often lost its link to joy. Newer spiritualities, generally, have fared no better. Superficial affirmations that we are a resurrection people and therefore should always be bouncy, upbeat, enthusiastic and never down, help re-enforce the false equation that joy means superficiality because the components are impossible to live. To live on this side of eternity means tears, incompleteness, bitter loneliness, and seasons of life wherein it is simply impossible to be bouncy and upbeat.

Other current spiritualities, at least as they are frequently lived out, affirm the equation between joy and superficiality by emphasizing anger, indignation, righteousness, and an undue sense of purpose and urgency about everything. In such a view, just as is the case in Marxism, joy again becomes something superficial, naive, and even something that positively stands in the way of genuine conversion and growth. Then, just as in the older view that life is a “valley of tears,” living becomes a grim, humorless, joyless and often bitter affair. These last words – grim, humorless, joyless and bitter – describe to some degree the church and secular circles we move in. Most frequently, these circles are sombre, anxious, over-burdened, cynical, humorless, heavy places, hard untender places. There is an undue sense of urgency and precious little childlikeness, freedom and simple joy. Worse still, and this is the real un-joy, our circles are also characterized by melancholy, distrust, anger, bitterness, suspicion, jealousies, and an unhealthy adultness and realism that lets us characterize laughter and play (as C.S. Lewis so aptly puts it) as a “disgusting and direct insult to the realism, dignity and austerity of hell.” (The Screwtape Letters, Page 58) As Christians, we need to be reminded that real asceticism lies in joy itself.

It is far easier, and it takes infinitely less discipline, to be heavy than to be light. Heaviness, resentment, anger, grudges, moroseness and lack of joy come naturally; light-heartedness, forgiveness, long-suffering, humor and joy have to be worked at. They require discipline and asceticism.

A commentator recently looked at the world and the church and remarked: “Crabby contentiousness is here to stay!” It is – so long as we confuse joy with superficiality and depth with heaviness of spirit.

Conversion Is Revolution!

We live too frustrated by our own mediocrity. The problem lies not in our unwillingness to convert, but in our inability to convert. We keep trying, by the way of good resolutions, to wage war against the bad habits of our hearts and minds. But we fail, grow discouraged, and generally live with a non-expressed despair, which lets us believe that for us, things cannot really change.

What’s at issue? The congenital moral ineptness that St. Paul speaks about in Romans? Perhaps. However, I suspect that more of the problem lies in our unwillingness to move toward the radicalism and upheaval that genuine conversion implies. Perhaps the best analogy available to us for understanding the real meaning of the word conversion is that of revolution. Conversion is an interior revolution. Anything less radical simply misses most of the meaning of that word.

When we look at the phenomenon of a political-social revolution, we see that a successful revolution brings about a new consciousness and a new system, a “new guard.” This replaces an “old guard,” a previously established consciousness and way of doing things. Such a revolution is characterized by, among other things, two salient features:

1. It is dramatic, not gradual: Revolution is not evolution. It is not a smooth transition or a peaceful, gradual, non-painful, non-upsetting thing. It is an upheaval, a radical overturning. It arises precisely when people have despaired of gradual change. When simple evolution and ordinary everyday changes provide the necessary growth, then revolution is not necessary. Revolution becomes necessary only when the old order is hopelessly stagnant, when there is no longer any hope that peaceful, non-violent, gradual change can bring about improvements of any significance.

2. All revolutions culminate in a purge: Once the new consciousness and order have been established, they must – and very quickly, too – purge themselves of all elements which are not single-mindedly and unequivocally supportive of the new ideals and the new system. That is why virtually every political-social revolution in history has been followed by a blood bath. All that is dissident is systematically eliminated. Why?

Because the new guard knows that, unless this is done, it will forever live under the danger that the old guard will rise up and recapture the new. For a new consciousness to survive, dissident and residual elements of the old guard must be killed off. As Scripture puts it: “You cannot put new wine into old wineskins!”

In real life, these dynamics are brutal, bloody and often times morally deplorable. When applied to an interior revolution, to radical conversion within our hearts and minds, they still remain brutal and violent, but they can be moral and they can help lead us to the truth that sets us free.

Conversion, to be effective, must be radical. It must be revolution!

If we were the type of persons that we should be, there would be no need of dramatic conversions within our lives. Evolution would be sufficient. We could grow through gradual, easeful, non-radical and non-violent means. Unfortunately, most often, that is not the case. There is no real evolution. We sense within our lives an immaturity, bad habits, a mediocrity and a moral ineptness, which barring an extraordinary intervention of grace, will keep us forever falling into the same pit.

Aristotle said: “Habits become one’s second nature.” He is correct. Bad habits do become our second natures. We make all kinds of resolutions to break out of these but find ourselves basically helpless. Year after year, we make the same good resolutions, and year after year we break them. What must we learn from this? That, after a time, we can no longer rid ourselves of bad habits by means which are easeful, gradual, don’t hurt too much and do not disrupt our lives too much. Too many things have been happening for too many years.

Evolution is no longer possible for us. Revolution and a certain violence are necessary. We must radically shake up our lives. But most of us do not like the subversive. We try instead, year after year, to change ourselves through good resolutions, through means that will not be too dramatic, painful or disruptive. That is why we fail and stay ever the same: mediocre, frustrated, and unable to break out of bad habits that have dominated our lives. It is our fear of dramatic upheaval, painful uprooting and new patterns of life that are hostile to established habits that, precisely, allow our bad habits and mediocrity to keep the upper hand.

Genuine conversion and real change will come when we have the nerve to risk dramatic upheaval.

When Sinners Rationalize

Several years ago, after the pope had been heckled during his visit in Holland, a Belgian newspaper ran an editorial that commented as follows: The difference between the Dutch and the Belgians can be seen in their separate reactions to the pope. In Holland, people don’t keep the commandments, but they still want to be saints, so they demand that the commandments be changed. In Belgium, we don’t keep the commandments, either, but we know we aren’t saints and so we admit it and ask for redemption. Perhaps there is bias in that comment as it relates to the differences between the Dutch and the Flemish, but it is insightful in another way.

Our culture struggles with honesty, with admitting weakness. Much within us and around us invites us to rationalize, to make excuses, to demand that standards be changed or re-integrated because we cannot live up to them. Less and less, even in prayer and confession, do we find searing honesty and contrition. This proclivity to rationalize and not admit weakness and sin is, singularly, the most deadly temptation facing each of us. Failure to admit weaknesses and acknowledge our sin as sin is infinitely more damaging than weakness and sin themselves. Failure in self-honesty is the start of the sin against the Holy Spirit, the only sin that can never be forgiven. We are familiar with Christ’s warning that there exists a sin, a certain blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, which can never be forgiven. What is this sin?

Simply put, it is the sin of lying to oneself until one becomes so warped that one believes one’s own lie. Falsehood becomes truth. The reason this sin cannot be forgiven is not that God does not want to forgive it, but rather that the person no longer sees the need for forgiveness. Living in darkness is seen as living in light; sin is seen as grace; perversion as virtue. The person living in this state feels a certain disdain for what is genuinely virtuous, innocent and happy. S/he would not accept forgiveness were it offered.  This sin begins always with rationalization, with the failure to admit to sin. And much within our world and ourselves feeds this temptation to rationalize, to take ourselves off the hook, to make ourselves look good by denying our weakness and sin.

We see this everywhere, in our tendency to avoid confession of all kinds, in our inability to take personal responsibility for our own unhappiness, and in our tendency to not admit our moral misery. We see it, too, in our inability to be searingly contrite in confession – whether in a church or elsewhere. More and more, our confessions are more protests against moral authority and rationalizations than they are honest admissions of simply being human and sinning. More common than genuine contrition is anger towards moral authority, especially towards the church. In my opinion, this does not augur well. The heart of anger, as someone once wisely stated, is a rebellion against what it means to be human.

Too rare, today, is the confession of the publican: “I’m a sinner! I’m a mess! I am morally inept, unable to live what I believe. I do dumb things because I am weak. There’s no excuse. And, God, I’m miserable, be merciful!” More common is the tendency to blame the church, its moral authorities, or our past religious training for the fact that we suffer from guilt and un-freedoms which leave us less than happy.

Ruth Burrows, in her “Guidelines for Mystical Prayer,” states: “I am shocked to see how little contrition, searing contrition, features in our living and dying.

“Only a saint can afford to die the death of a saint. The rest of us need to go out as sinners in our own eyes and in the eyes of our entourage, and our peace must come from trust in God’s goodness, not the complacent but unexpressed assumption that we lived for God.” (Page 69)

She goes on to tell the stories of two nuns with whom she lived. The first was a sister who was not faithful to her life of prayer. She lived in mediocrity for most of her life. However, she admitted it. She never played games, pretending she was anything other than what she was – mediocre. As she grew older, she made more of an effort at fidelity, but habits die hard and she died before she fully succeeded. But she died a happy death, a sinner asking God to forgive her a life of human weakness. The second sister also lived a life of mediocrity and infidelity in charity and prayer. Unlike the first sister, however, she never admitted this. To herself and to others, she postured saintliness. The result was a sad lie; harmful, most of all, to herself.

Only a saint can afford to live and die that role. The rest of us must live and die in searing contrition, sinners asking God and others to forgive us a life of weakness. In such honesty lies redemption. In anything less honest lie seeds, which, if allowed to grow, lead one to begin to blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.

Signals That Spell Sanctity

Self-delusion is always easy, and nowhere is it easier than in our assessment of our own spiritual health. How do we know whether we are healthy or not? How do we know whether we are actually praying or not? Doing God’s will or our own? Living in the Holy Spirit or someone else’s spirit? Acting in charity or self-interest? Growing or stagnating?

Discernment is difficult. We may not simply conclude that things are going forward when we feel good about ourselves and backward when we don’t. Lack of pain, self-assurance, a sense of security and the sense that we are getting ourselves together are not necessarily criteria by which we judge growth and health.  How do we judge whether or not we are spiritually healthy?

I would like to submit here a brief chart. Each column represents a basic tonality that our lives can have:

Restless

Restful

Compulsive

Inner Freedom

Hyper

Calm

Impatient.

Patient

Angry

Empathetic/Compassionate

Competitive

Humble/Connected to others

Bitter

Understanding/forgiving

Self-preoccupied/narcissistic

Self-forgetful/solicitous of others’ needs

Pragmatically-enslaved

Able to play/enjoy

Cynical

Child-like

Disdainful of ideals

Idealistic

Humorless

Healthy sense of humor

Easeful with ideologies

Living with painful complexity

Narrow loyalties

Ecumenically-hearted

Unenthusiastic

Some element of sparkle

Need to control

Easeful

Paranoid/constantly sensing threat

Able to live in vulnerability

Caught in rat race/sensing loss of control

Prayerful

Feeling like a minority of one

A sense of God’s presence

Sense of helplessness

Hopeful

Self pity/constant sense of personal injustice

Altruism/charity

Joyless/sombre

Joy/a sense of gratitude

Looking at this chart, it is evident that one can never, once and for all, achieve restfulness, inner freedom, calmness, patience, self-forgetfulness, and all the rest of the qualities that would have us living fully in God’s spirit. We vacillate between these two columns, but we know when our lives are more colored by one set of qualities than the other. And we shouldn’t play games with ourselves, believing that we are maturing and growing humanly and spiritually when our lives are colored with bitterness, when we lack humor, and when we live somber, unenthusiastic lives that are devoid of gratitude and playfulness. It would do most of us well, I suspect, to approach the sacrament of reconciliation sometimes with the following words: “Bless me, father, for I have sinned.

“I need reconciliation because I am restless, compulsive, hyper, impatient, angry, competitive, bitter, self-preoccupied and narcissistic. I am also pragmatically enslaved, cynical, disdainful of ideals, humorless, too easeful with ideologies and I have narrow loyalties.

“Beyond that, I tend to be unenthusiastic, I have a need to be in control. I am paranoid and sense others as a threat. I am caught in the rat race, I don’t pray enough and feel like I am losing control of my life.

“I generally feel like a minority of one, have a growing sense of helplessness, am too prone to self-pity and constantly feel slighted. Worst of all, there is too little joy in my life. I am too sombre.”

After the priest would have gotten over his shock, you, like the publican in Scripture, would go home justified, actually having prayed.

The Martyrdom Of Obscurity

We crave few things as deeply as self-expression. Deep within the eros that makes us restless and dissatisfied lies the incurable need to express ourselves, to be known, recognized, understood, and seen by others as unique and as having deep riches inside of us. Self-expression, being known and being experienced in our depth, is vital to living and loving. A heart which is unknown, unappreciated in its depth and lacking in meaningful self-expression is always a restless and frustrated heart. It is normally, too, a competitive and bitter one. But meaningful self-expression is difficult and full self-expression is impossible.

In the end, all of us live in obscurity, unknown, frustrated. Our lives are always smaller than our needs and our dreams. Ultimately, we all live in small towns, no matter where we live; and, save for a few brief moments of satisfaction, spend most of our lives waiting for a fuller moment to come, waiting for a time when we will be less hidden. From this frustration stems a tremendous restlessness and dissatisfaction. Each of us would like to be the famous writer, the graceful ballerina, the admired athlete, the movie star, the cover girl, the renowned scholar, the Nobel Prize winner, the household name. But, in the end, each of us is just another unknown, living with other unknowns, collecting an occasional autograph.

Our lives always seem too small for us. We sense ourselves as extraordinary persons living very ordinary lives. Because of this sense of obscurity, we are seldom satisfied, easeful and happy with our lives. There is always, too, much still inside of us that wants expression, that needs recognition, that feels that something very precious, unique and rich is living and dying in futility.  And, in truth, seen only from the perspective of this world, much that is precious, unique and rich is living and dying in futility. Only a rare few achieve meaningful self-expression.

There is a certain martyrdom in this. Iris Murdoch once said: “Art has its martyrs, not the least of which are those who have preserved their silence.” Lack of self-expression, whether chosen or imposed by circumstances, is a real death. Like all death, however, it can be paschal or terminal. If merely accepted as inevitable, it leads to bitterness and a broken spirit. If linked to the paschal mystery of Christ, if it is seen as an opportunity to enter the hidden life of Christ, it leads to a new ease in life, to restfulness, and it lays the axe to the root of our competitiveness, anger and bitterness.

Today we are called, as Christians, to the martyrdom of obscurity. Christianity always invites its adherents to martyrdom. To be a follower of Christ demands that one lay down one’s life. But this takes various forms. For Jesus and his apostles, as for many early Christians during the times of the persecutions, martyrdom meant physical death. They had to give up the possibilities that this life offered in order to remain true to a more distant possibility – permanent intimacy with God and each other. In dying, they entered the hidden life of Christ.

That type of martyrdom is still being asked of Christians in many parts of the world, notably in Latin America. In North America and Western Europe, however, at least of many of us, a different kind of martyrdom is being asked. Our culture persecutes its Christians in a different way. Affluence and leisure have created a higher psychic temperature. These have focused us on interpersonal, sexual, artistic, athletic and scientific achievement. In a word, they have focused us on self-expression. In our culture, meaningful self-expression is everything; lack of it is death. Yet, it is this death that paschally we must enter.

Not that we should, in the name of the Gospel, be uncreative, unresourceful, phlegmatic or stoic under-achievers. But we should, in the name of the Gospel, enter the hidden life of Christ within which that current of eros which drives us mercilessly toward self-expression can be more properly channelled, so that we do not go through life unhealthily competitive, bitter, angry, hopelessly restless, not at ease, and basically unhappy because we are ordinary and obscure. Only when we enter the martyrdom of obscurity will our ordinary lives be enough.

Thomas Merton, after experiencing solitude for several years in a hermitage, once wrote: “It is enough to be, in an ordinary human mode, with one’s hunger and sleep, one’s cold and warmth, rising and going to bed. Putting on blankets and taking them off, making coffee and drinking it. Defrosting the refrigerator, reading, meditating, working, praying, I live as my fathers have lived on this earth, until eventually I die. Amen. There’s no need to make an assertion of my life, especially so about its being mine, though doubtless it is not somebody else’s. I must learn to live so as gradually to forget program and artifice.” (quoted by J.H. Griffin, Follow the Ecstasy, Page 37)

Ordinary life can be enough for us, but only if we first undergo the martyrdom of obscurity and enter Christ’s hidden life. It’s not easy, however. In many ways, it is easier to sacrifice life itself than to sacrifice dreams.

Born Into The Ordinary

Christmas is about God in the ordinary. After the birth of Christ, we need not look to the extraordinary, the spectacular, the miraculous to find God. God is now found where we live, in our kitchens, at our tables, in our wounds and in each others’ faces. That is hard to believe and always has been. When Jesus was on earth, virtually no one believed he was the Messiah precisely because he was so ordinary, so unlike what they’d imagined God to be. People were looking for a Messiah. When finally Christ did appear, they were disappointed. They’d expected a superstar, a king, a miracle worker, someone who would, by miracle and hammer, vindicate good, destroy evil and turn the world rightfully upside down. Jesus didn’t live up to those expectations. Born in a barn, preaching meekness and gentleness, unwilling to use power in a forceful way, there was little hammer and few miracles. Mainly, there was ordinariness.

It is curious that Scripture refuses to describe what Jesus looked like. It never tells us whether he was short or tall, with beard or without, had light or dark hair, or blue or brown eyes. Neither does it ever assign to him anything extraordinary in terms of psychological countenance: for example, it never tells us that when Jesus entered a room, his eyes were so penetrating and his gaze so awesome that people knew they were in the presence of something extraordinary. No, Scripture doesn’t describe him because, in terms of physical appearance, Jesus wasn’t worth describing, he looked like everyone else. Even after the resurrection, he is mistaken for a gardener, a cook, a traveller. People had trouble recognizing Jesus as God incarnate because he was so ordinary, so immersed in the things they took for granted. He was just a carpenter’s son and he looked like everyone else.

Things haven’t changed much in 2,000 years. Seldom does Christ meet expectations. We, like his contemporaries, are constantly looking beyond the ordinary, beyond the gardener, the cook, and the traveller, to try to find a miraculous Christ. It is for this reason that we fly to Fatima or Lourdes to see a spot where the Blessed Virgin might have cried and left us a message, but fail to see the significance of tears shed at our own breakfast table. We are intrigued by Padre Pio who had the wounds of Christ in his hands, but fail to see the wounds of Christ in those suffering around us, or in our own emotional and moral wounds. We pray for visions but seldom watch a sunset. We marvel at the gift of tongues, but are bored listening to babies. We desire proofs for the existence of God even as life in all its marvels continues all around us. We tend to look for God everywhere, except in the place where the incarnation took place – our flesh.

Nikos Kazantzakis once wrote: “God is not found in monasteries, but in our homes! Wherever you find husband and wife, that’s where you find God: wherever children and petty cares and cooking and arguments and reconciliation are, that’s where God is, too. The God I’m telling about, the domestic one, not the monastic one, that’s the real God.” (The Last Temptation of Christ, Page 70) Christmas celebrates the domestic God, the God born into ordinary life.

Several years ago, at a prayer seminar I was attending, a lady was giving a talk on Zen. She was describing how she spent more than two hours a day in meditation and how she would, through this practice, have very deep and lucid connections with the transcendent. During the question period, I asked her how she would compare the feelings of God that she experienced during meditation with the feelings she had when she ate dinner with her family. “No comparison,” she replied. “Eating dinner with my family can be a good experience, holy even in its own way. But the experience of God in meditation is much more real. The way God is experienced in meditation dwarfs everything else.”

I do not want to question the importance of meditation, nor indeed the value of Lourdes, Fatima and Padre Pio, but I am Christian enough to be pagan enough to demand some qualifications here. We should pray meditatively, and perhaps we can benefit from Fatima, Lourdes and Padre Pio. But, in the end, we must realize that God is domestic more than monastic.

1 John 4:7-16, says: “God is love and whoever abides in love abides in God and God abides in him/her.” Love is a thing that happens in ordinary life, in kitchens, at tables, in workplaces, in families, in the flesh. God abides in us when we abide there. The Christ-child is also to be found in church, in the sacraments and in private meditations (for these, too, are ordinary). All of these are ordinary and the incarnation crawls into them and helps us, there, to abide in God.

Merry Christmas!

Like Green Logs In The Fire

Nikos Kazantzakis once commented: “People are impatient, but God’s not in a hurry!” That’s a good line to reflect upon as we enter into Advent. Looking at the religious history that leads up to the birth of Christ, we cannot help but be struck by the fact that God seemingly takes his time. The Old Testament is a history of longing and yearning: deep longing for running streams, hearts aching for consummation, people struggling for freedom. Yet, in the Old Testament, there is little fulfilment, there are few times where God intervenes directly. Mostly, it is a book about desire and frustration. And it is a long book.

Time passes, centuries pass, people grow old and pass on, and desires remain unfulfilled, frustration intensifies. Eventually, the cry arises: “Come, Lord, come! Save us! How much longer must we wait? When, Lord, when? Why not now?” The people grow ever more impatient, but God will not be hurried. Why not? Looking at that centuries-long first Advent, we might validly ask: Why didn’t God hurry? Why did he wait so long? Why all those centuries of longing and yearning, of frustration and tears? Does God have a cruel thirst for suffering? Can he afford to be so patient, so plodding in his plans, when we are suffering so much?

The Old Testament itself already answers these questions partly with its idea: “Every tear brings the messiah closer!” What is affirmed here is that there is an intrinsic connection between aching, pain and frustration, and the possibility of a messiah being born. Messiahs are born only after a long period of yearning. We see this already in human births. The process of gestation cannot be hurried. As well, in childbirth, there is an intrinsic connection between the pain the mother experiences and the possibility of new life.

This is also true of Christ’s birth. Advent, that centuries-long gestation period, could not be rushed. Tears, pain and countless prayers were needed to create the conditions for the pregnancy. They are still connected with the possibility of Christ appearing within life. God made the people wait for a messiah, not because he has a cruel thirst for suffering, but because the dynamics of love, life and birth demand Advent. They are realities that must be gestated. They, like messiahs, can only be born when people are ready for them – namely, when, through suffering and yearning and prayer, a space is created, a womb is formed. Further metaphors can be useful in understanding this:

John of the Cross, in trying to shed light on the process of coming to love, uses the image of a log coming to flame in a fireplace. When a green log is placed in a fire, it does not start to burn immediately. It needs first to be dried out. Thus, for a long time, it lies in the fire and sizzles, its greenness and dampness slowly drying out. Only when it reaches kindling temperature does it ignite and burst into flame. The log catches fire after an Advent. So, too, our entry into love, community, God’s kingdom. We become part of the fire, ignite into love only when we, damp logs that we are, are sufficiently dried out. We ignite in love only when we have sizzled sufficiently. We sizzle through desire and through aching. This is the meaning of Advent.

Teilhard de Chardin called it the “raising of our psychic temperatures.” In chemistry, as we know, it is possible to place two elements in the same test tube and not get fusion. Sometimes it is only after they are heated to a higher temperature that certain elements will unite. People are no different. Often it is only when psychic temperatures are raised sufficiently that there is fusion, reconciliation, respect, love, patience, chastity, space. Prior to that, there is separateness, egoism, narcissism, selfishness. We raise our psychic temperatures through desire, through prayer, through learning to wait for God.

Advent is about all this. In Advent, we learn that the pains of inconsummation, the daily frustration of incompleteness, the aching for a wholeness we can never attain, are pains that can be incredible means of purification. Every tear brings the messiah closer. Every frustration can make us more ready to love, to forgive. Every longing can lead us to deeper prayer. Every time we groan in our incompleteness, we are closer to helping gestate a womb within which the messiah can appear. It is with much groaning of the flesh that the life of the spirit is brought forth. Preparing for Christmas is not just a matter of getting the shopping done, the cards out, the tree up, the lights strung and the gifts wrapped. This is the season to yearn, to sizzle in inconsummation, to pray a little more, to be in touch with our deeper longings, to raise our psychic temperatures. It is the season to try to stretch our hearts and minds so as to create the space, the womb, within which a messiah can be born.

Later is the season to be jolly!

Fr. Walgrave, We’ll Miss You

Recently, almost unnoticed, a brief obituary note appeared in a number of religious and secular newspapers around the world: Theologian dies – Belgian theologian, Jan Hendrik Walgrave, dead at 75. I want to write a short tribute to this man, not because I once had a brief and privileged opportunity to meet him and to study under him, but because the Catholic community should know that someone important to them has died and they should know, at least minimally, why he was important. When an important person, someone who has made a significant contribution dies, that death should be noted so that this person’s life can speak for the benefit of more persons.

Jan Walgrave was a significant person. But who was he? If he was so important and famous, then why have so many not heard of him? He was one of the better-kept secrets in theology, though not for those who work more deeply behind its inner walls. In popular circles, he was not a household name, a Barth, a Schillebeeckx, a Kung, but among theologians he was noticed and respected in a way very few others are. That respect was earned. He was a solid, conscientious thinker who scrupulously researched everything he produced. And he was a prolific writer, authoring dozens of books and hundreds of articles (in five languages). However, he never wrote in a popular genre, and so even though he produced a small library of writings, few of these are known to people outside professional circles. He wrote technical theology for professional theologians.

It is hard to begin to describe how he impacted the church. He was, of course, one of the theologians who helped lay the ground for Vatican II – and Vatican II influenced the rest of us. Mostly, though, he influenced hundreds of other theologians who, in turn, influenced others. He was the experts’ expert. People came from around the world to listen to him. Professional theologians know of and recognize the incredible range of his thought. He was an expert in medieval history, medieval spirituality, medieval and modern philosophy, systematic theology, world religions, theological methodology and Christian apologetics. Beyond this, he was recognized as perhaps the world’s foremost expert on the thought of John Henry Newman. People came from around the world to study Newman under him. As well – and this testifies to his extraordinariness – since English and Spanish were his fourth and fifth languages, students would come from England to study Coleridge and Chesterton with him and from Spain to discuss Ortega y Gasset. And there was more to him than expertise in theology. Someone once wisely commented that there was three keys to human health: proportion, humor and childlikeness. These he had, in extraordinary combination: a powerful intellect, great learning, in a childlike personality. And there was always humor and proportion: “Cigars, Chesterton and Mozart,” he used to say with a wink, “the keys to a peaceful soul!” If he had a weakness it was that he was too gentle. He once told me that in more than 40 years of teaching, he only failed one student, and that was because the student did not show up for the exam.

However, this tribute is meant to do more than eulogize. A great person has passed on. What message has he left us? As you read the rest of this, picture a man with a hat, looking physically not alike Alfred Hitchcock. He is holding a cigar and smiling in an almost-wink. These are his final words: “Mystery, poetry, restless cogitation, faith. “Let the mystery baffle you, humble you, that’s the existential imperative. Give your life to thought and theology, but don’t fight about these nor take them too seriously. All problems more or less dissolve, at a certain point, into a misty horizon. Keep staring into that misty horizon: Behind it lies God.”

“Keep your balance by reading poetry, children’s stories and mystery novels. We are moved more by symbols, poetry and fairy tales than by rational arguments.”

“Poetry, more than conceptual systems, can save us. Imagination is the only instrument that can save reason, and fantasy is what helps us keep our feet on the ground.”

“Without reason, of course, poetry runs wild; but reason, without poetry, naturally and necessarily leads to an empty conceptualism in which we end up precisely with our head in the clouds.”

“Restless cogitation, eros that leaves you in a constant disquiet, these are God’s lure. These will lead you to the desert. There God can form you in faith. Faith is an assent that implies restless cogitation.”

Then there is a final wink, and…

“Remember: cigars, Chesterton and Mozart, there’s peace of soul in these, too!”

Jan Hendrik Walgrave, teacher, scholar, monk, priest, theologian, linguist, writer, poet, friend of many, enjoyer of life, the gentleman always, 1911-1986, RIP. The Christian community salutes you.

Monasticism And Family Life

There is a tradition, strong among spiritual writers, that we will not advance within the spiritual life unless we pray at least an hour a day privately. I was stressing this one day in a talk, when a lady asked how this might apply to her, given that she was home with young children who demanded her total attention. “Where would I ever find an uninterrupted hour each day?” she moaned. “I would, I am afraid, be praying with children screaming and tugging at my pant legs.”

A few years ago, I might have been tempted to point out to her that if her life was that hectic then she, of all people, needed time daily away from her children, for private prayer, among other things. As it is, I gave her different advice: “If you are home alone with small children whose needs give you little uninterrupted time, then you don’t need an hour of private prayer daily. Raising small children, if it is done with love and generosity, will do for you exactly what private prayer does.” Left unqualified, that is a dangerous statement. It, in fact, suggests that raising children is a functional substitute for prayer.

However, in making the assertion that a certain service – in this case, raising children – can in fact be prayer, I am bolstered by the testimony of contemplatives themselves. Carlo Carretto, one of our century’s best spiritual writers, spent many years in the Sahara Desert by himself praying. Yet he once confessed that he felt that his mother, who spent nearly 30 years raising children, was much more contemplative than he was, and less selfish. If that is true, and Carretto suggests that it is, the conclusion we should draw is not that there was anything wrong with his long hours of solitude in the desert, but that there was something very right about the years his mother lived an interrupted life amid the noise and demands of small children.

John of the Cross, in speaking about the very essence of the contemplative life, writes: “But they, O my God and my life, will see and experience your mild touch, who withdraw from the world and become mild, bringing the mild into harmony with the mild, thus enabling themselves to experience and enjoy you.” (The Living Flame, 2, 17) In this statement, John suggests that there are two elements that are crucial to the contemplative’s experience of God – namely, withdrawal from the world and the bringing of oneself into harmony with the mild. Although his writings were intended primarily for monks and contemplative nuns who physically withdraw from the world so as to seek a deeper empathy with it, his principles are just as true for those who cannot withdraw physically.

Certain vocations, e.g., raising children, offer a perfect setting for living a contemplative life. They provide a desert for reflection, a real monastery. The mother who stays home with small children experiences a very real withdrawal from the world. Her existence is certainly monastic. Her tasks and preoccupations remove her from the centres of social life and from the centres of important power. She feels removed. Moreover, her constant contact with young children, the mildest of the mild, gives her a privileged opportunity to be in harmony with the mild and learn empathy and unselfishness. Perhaps more so even than the monk or the minister of the Gospel, she is forced, almost against her will, to mature. For years, while she is raising small children, her time is not her own, her own needs have to be put into second place, and every time she turns around some hand is reaching out demanding something. Years of this will mature most anyone. It is because of this that she does not need, during this time, to pray for an hour a day. And it is precisely because of this that the rest of us, who do not have constant contact with small children, need to pray privately daily.

We, to a large extent, do not have to withdraw. We can, often, put our own needs first. We can claim some of our own time. We do not work with what is mild. Our worlds are professional, adult, cold and untender. Outside of prayer, we run a tremendous risk of becoming selfish and bringing ourselves into harmony with what is untender. Monks and contemplative nuns withdraw from the world to try to become less selfish, more tender, and more in harmony with the mild. To achieve this, they pray for long hours in solitude.

Mothers with young children are offered the identical privilege: withdrawal, solitude, the mild. But they do not need the long hours of private prayer – the demands and mildness of the very young are a functional substitute.

Abortion: No Quick Solutions

For more and more of us, I suspect, the issue of abortion brings up feelings of helplessness that border on despair. The issue is so important that a conscientious person may not remain silent for long without incurring guilt. But what responses are truly productive? What can genuinely help change this situation? What would Jesus do? Would he organize political lobbies? Lobby for pro-life candidates? Withhold portions of his income tax? Demonstrate outside abortion clinics? Chain himself to a fence?

I honestly don’t know. There is in me neither the vision nor the will to try to answer those questions. What I do want to offer, and rather hesitatingly at that, are the rather meager fruits from my own struggles with these questions. I have always been, and remain, uncompromisingly pro-life. Rightly or wrongly, however, I haven’t always been involved in the active struggle, the political organizing and the demonstrations. Why? Sometimes I rationalize that if God had wanted me to be a prophet, he would have given me greater strength and a less ambiguous vision. As it is, I am Germanic, complete with the proclivity for procrastination and the need for the infallible assurance, before I act, that I am not making a mistake. But, these things aside, my hesitation has also been based upon a belief that this issue, for all its urgency, has no quick solution.

To begin to explain this, I need to speak about power. What kind of power may we seize upon to try to change this situation? Too many people, I am afraid, have placed their hopes in legal power, political power. The belief is that if we work hard enough we can get the laws changed, put abortionists on trial and close down abortion clinics. To this end, we demonstrate, withhold taxes, and organize lobbies and chain ourselves to fences. I am not suggesting that these things do not need to be done; after all, real people are dying. This battle is more than academic. And yet, the only real solution is long-range. This battle, in the end, cannot be won legally and politically. Ultimately, more so than laws, hearts need to be changed.

Conversion is the only effective way of ultimately ending abortions. Abortion clinics will shut down when nobody shows up at their doors any more. To win the battle politically, without a conversion of hearts, will simply roll back the clock, drive people into illegal backroom clinics, allow abortionists like Henry Morgentaler to posture as martyrs, and lead to a renewed effort on the part of the pro-abortionists. It will be a temporary slowing down of abortions, at best. Moreover, this conversion must involve a conversion within relationships. Today, the issue of abortion cannot be fairly thought out because radical feminism has claimed pro-choice as one of its key liberation items. To be pro-life is to be classified as anti-feminist.

This is tragic for both sides on this issue because, consequently, sincere people, including women, are forced to distance themselves from feminism; and feminists, on their part, are all too often forced to distance themselves from one of the things they would most need to change in order to bring about healthier relationships between women and men – namely, the stopping of abortion. Radical feminism has seen, and rightly so, a connection between the abortion issue and feminine oppression. Unfortunately, it has not always, in my opinion, understood that connection correctly, even as it intuited its gravity. The oppression of women in our culture is especially sexual. In a culture that is sexually irresponsible, the inevitable losers are women. They end up suffering the most.

When a culture exists within which men and women do not trust each other, within which sexual irresponsibility is encouraged in (and even, at times, forced upon) young people, and within which women – for reasons which are often far beyond their free choosing, sleep with and conceive children from men whom they hardly know, don’t trust, and do not want to raise a child with – you inevitably have abortion. But it is not the girl or woman who shows up at the abortion clinic who is most to blame, nor perhaps even the boy or man who impregnates her. We are all to blame. The lady who stands before the abortionists is, with her child, victim, the tip of a pinecone of irresponsibility and oppression. And, on her part, abortion is an act of resignation. No woman ever really wants an abortion and no woman is ever happy for having had one. As Ginny Soley puts it in a recent Sojourner article: “Abortion is, finally, an act of despair. The decision to have an abortion reflects a woman’s lack of confidence in herself. It means that she does not trust the man with whom she is in relationship. It means that she has no belief in long-lasting, long-term, stable relationships between men and women. In fact, it means that she has lost confidence in life itself.” (Sojourners, October, 1986)

The road to final victory on the issue of abortion is long, the task mammoth. Hearts need to change, relationship need to change, sexual patterns need to change, oppression needs to be recognized; and real villains and real victims must be more accurately named.