RonRolheiser,OMI

Our Language Regarding Suicide

A A A

I generally try to be sensitive to using politically correct language, though sometimes that can be exasperating because of various hypersensitivities where people are too easily offended. Simply put, someone can take offense at almost any word. However, despite our occasional exasperation with those who are too easily offended, we must admit that in the past we were too careless and callous in our naming of things. Our vocabulary was often hurtful precisely to those who were most hurting. We had too many pejorative and belittling terms about those who were different from us and about those who suffered from various disabilities.

With that in mind, I would like to make a suggestion regarding how we speak about suicide. The common expression is that someone “committed” suicide. That verb needs to be struck from our vocabulary when we talk about suicide.

Very few people who die by suicide, “commit” suicide. More accurately they “succumb” to it in the same way as someone succumbs to cancer, a stroke, or a heart attack. Fifteen years ago, I was diagnosed with cancer. I didn’t “commit” cancer, it overpowered my immune system against my will. It’s the same with a stroke or heart attack. You don’t “commit” a stroke or a heart attack. They overpower your natural resistance.

Physically we have an immune system which, akin to police on patrol, keeps vigilance over our health, seeking out bacteria, viruses, and malignant cells and destroying them before they can take root, multiply, destroy our health, and cause death. But as we know, sometimes for all kinds of reasons, a malignancy can overpower our immune system and our health breaks down and we die because our natural protection against sickness is overpowered by bacteria, viruses, the breakdown of a vital organ, or some cancerous cells. We die, not by choice, but by conscription. We don’t “commit” a sickness.

The same holds true for our mental health. Mentally, we also have an immune system that, akin to patrolling police, keeps vigil on our psychological and emotional health. But, as with our physical health, sometimes a factor or a combination of factors (genetics, trauma, clinical depression, a tragic life circumstance) can overpower our psychological and emotional immune system and we can succumb to a sickness (unbidden and unwelcome) called suicide.

This is true, I submit, for most people who die by suicide. There are exceptions of course, though these are exceptions, not the norm. Someone can indeed “commit” suicide where, in effect, they are not succumbing in weakness to an illness but are in strength making a proactive choice. Thus, we can make a distinction between what might be called “killing oneself” as opposed to “succumbing to suicide.”  

Someone can kill himself out of strength, pride, and arrogance: I’m too proud and special to share life with the rest of you! Life has not honored my specialness. I’d rather die than continue to live in this world! That’s the difference between a Hitler-type suicide and that of an oversensitive soul too bruised and wounded to continue to fight for life. The former chooses suicide out of strength; the latter dies out of weakness. (Albeit, in fairness, we may not even judge Hitler. Who knows what malignancies overpowered his mental immune system?)

With that being said, allow me to reiterate some key truths vis-à-vis suicide which need to be said, said, and said again, until they need not to be said anymore.

In most cases of suicide:

  • We are dealing with a very sensitive or deeply wounded person who is too bruised to touch or too wounded to respond any longer to our outreach.
  • The one dying of suicide dies against his or her will.
  • Their manner of death is akin to jumping out of a high-rise window because your clothing is on fire.
  • Their manner of death is the equivalent of an emotional cancer, stroke, or heart attack.
  •  In many cases suicidal depression has some biochemical roots.
  • Suicide is not an act of despair. One doesn’t choose to lose hope, rather wound and illness overpower hope.
  • Suicide is not an act of selfishness, though it may seem so.
  • We need not be anxious about the eternal salvation of those who die by suicide. God’s empathy and understanding are infinitely deeper than our own.

When persons we know and love die by suicide, one of our tasks is to redeem their memory so that the gift their life brought to the world is not denigrated and erased because we now view their life through the prism of how they died.

To die of a heart attack, cancer, or stroke can be sad and tragic, but it’s not shameful. The same for dying by suicide. It’s sad and tragic, but it’s not shameful. Indeed, it may be the most unglamorous and humble of all deaths and thus deserves a special empathy and understanding.

When speaking about suicide, our vocabulary needs to reflect that special empathy, and to do that we need to eliminate the phrase: “someone committed suicide.”

The Struggle to Be Sincere

A A A

Who are we really? Who are we when we are stripped naked in soul: stripped of ego, stripped of the image we have of ourselves, stripped of the hype, fads, and ideologies that we unconsciously inhale and which color our thinking, stripped of the trauma we carry from our wounds, and stripped of our habitual unconscious posturing?

When are we sincere?

In a popular understanding, the word sincere comes from two Latin words: Sine (meaning without) and Cera (meaning wax). To be sincere is to be without wax, that is, to be who we truly are beneath all the levels of ego, self-image, ideology, trauma, and unconscious posturing that beset us. It’s not easy to be sincere, given the baffling complexities of our minds and hearts. It’s hard to dig beneath it all to touch who we really are.

So, when are we sincere? I offer two stories in response.

The first comes from Ruth Burrows, one of the deep mystical writers of recent times. She tells this story of how, one day, all the wax was stripped away and she found herself naked in soul.

She grew up in England and both she and her family were not particularly religious. Her parents sent her to an all-girls private school run by an order of nuns, not for religious reasons but because the education there was superior to that of the local public schools.

She did her high school years there, never really immersing herself in her faith. Then, in preparation for their graduation, the nuns took the students to a renewal center for a retreat. Ruth and one of classmates did not take the retreat seriously, but giggled, snickered, and passed notes to each other during the conferences given by the retreat director. So, at a point, the nuns pulled Ruth and her friend out of the group and, while her classmates were listening to a lecture, Ruth and her friend had to sit silently in the chapel for those hours, under the watchful eye of a nun. Initially, Ruth confesses, she and her friend still fought being serious; they still giggled and winked at each other.

But the hours were long! And during one particularly long period of silence, she had a moment of grace, of clarity, of sincerity, of nakedness of soul. In the moment, she saw herself for who she really was – a young woman, air-headed, not thinking straight, caught up ego and hype, but also, underneath it all, a good, loving person loved warmly by God. The single moment of clarity changed her life.

This graced moment came to Ruth Burrows seemingly unbidden, though no doubt the deeper levels her mind and heart were inviting that graced visitation.

My second story is more earthy, but powerful precisely because of that. Some years ago, I had close friend, only fifty-four years of age, dying of cancer. When he entered hospice, I brought him Therese of Lisieux’ book, The Story of a Soul. Some days later, as we talked on the phone, he shared this: “Thank you for the book by Therese of Lisieux, it’s the only thing I can still read. When you’re dying, it cuts away all the bullshit. You know what’s real and what’s not.”  The dying process was his mystical moment; it brought him to sincerity.

So, how do we get there? How do we cut through all that sits between us and sincerity, between us and nakedness of soul?

We need to consciously take that to daily prayer. Indeed, during the second half of life our basic struggle in our prayer is precisely to try to bring ourselves to nakedness of soul, to be before God and our ourselves without wax. We need to take our struggle to God. This is the very essence of contemplative prayer, of contemplation.

Thomas Merton once said: “With God, a little sincerity goes a long, long way.”  We can take consolation in knowing that God understands that the struggle is hard, and that most of the time we have at least a little sincerity. And we can touch our sincerity through an intention that transcends the struggle with our feelings.

Here’s an example from Thomas Merton on how to express that intention to prayer.

“My Lord God, I believe that the desire to please you does in fact please you. And I hope that I will never do anything apart from that desire. And I know that if I do this you will lead me by the right road though I may know nothing about it.”

However, when we get to sincerity and nakedness of soul, the effect may surprise us. As Merton puts it: “Let no one hope to find in contemplation an escape from conflict, from anguish, or from doubt.” On the contrary, the deep certitude of contemplative experience awakens a tragic anguish and opens many questions in the depth of the heart like wounds that cannot stop bleeding.” But always remember: “With God, a little sincerity goes a long, long way.”

Inviting Each Other to Our Better Selves

A A A

I grew up in a rural area where most everyone was either a first or second-generation immigrant. Most of us were just above the poverty line, struggling economically and struggling to speak English properly. We were also struggling to access higher education, both because a lot of my peers had to end their schooling after the eighth grade to help support the family and because the idea of university education was not yet part of most families’ ethos.

In our community there was one family for which this wasn’t true. They were comfortable economically and a number of them had gone on to higher education and were now professionals in different fields. They were a privileged family.

But they wore it well. There was no snobbishness, flaunting, or superiority complex. The opposite. They used their gifts to try to help the community. One of their sons became a teacher and taught in one of the local schools, and for a number of years the family set up a curling rink every winter for the community. They were both admired and respected.

One day one of their sons was sitting with a group of young men who were sharing a beer, sharing stories, and enjoying some healthy banter, when the son of this much respected family made a blatantly racist remark. There was an awkward silence. Then one of men, in a gentle voice, said this to him: “You know, it surprises me that you would say something like that. Your family is so classy. We all look up to you. This doesn’t sound like you.”

The man’s reaction was immediate and contrite: “You’re right. I’m sorry. I don’t know why I say things like that. That was stupid.”

I can imagine a very different reaction had he been challenged with hard words like: “You’re a racist! How can you say something like that!

When we challenge each other in harsh words, the effect often serves to make us more defensive and freeze us in our view. We are being scolded, rebuked, shamed, and that can work just as easily to re-entrench as to persuade. It also serves to harden the space between us rather than invite us to what’s best and highest in ourselves.

We need to invite and challenge each other to what’s best and higher inside us.

And what is best and higher inside us?

Some of our early Christian writers (the Church Fathers) suggested that each of us has a double personality and heart. In each of us, they submit, there is a big, generous, noble, altruistic heart. But, inside each of us too, there is a wounded, petty, and selfish heart; and at any given time, we can be operating out of one heart or the other. We can be big-hearted and we can be petty, and this can change from one hour to the next depending on what’s meeting us in life.

Here’s an example: Imagine you wake up some morning feeling altruistic and noble of heart. At that moment, you have the mind and heart of Jesus. In that holy frame of mind, you go to work and there someone is cold and sarcastic with you. In one minute, everything can switch; you no longer have the mind and heart of Jesus, nor the mind and heart of what’s best in you. The wounded petty heart in you trumps the big heart, warmth and understanding leave you, and you now feel cold and bitter.

Now imagine this in reverse: You wake up some morning feeling paranoid, misunderstood, and nursing old wounds. At that moment you don’t have the mind and heart of Jesus, nor are you attuned to what’s better and higher in your own mind and heart. You go to work in that unholy state and there, unexpectedly, some co-worker greets you warmly and shares how much she appreciates your work and your friendship. In one minute, the noble mind in you trumps the petty mind and all that’s best and generous in you rises to the surface and you want to be a better person. You flip from bitterness to graciousness in one minute.

We live in a polarized world today where so many issues bitterly divide us and invite us not to what’s noble and best in us, but rather to what’s wounded, paranoid, and defensive. We need a new tone in our discourse, one of invitation and respect, one that recognizes what’s noble and big-hearted in the other and then challenges the other to own what’s best in him or her.

Instead of name-calling and assaulting each other with slogans, we need to say to each other: “You know, it surprises me that you would say something like that. You’re so classy! We all look up to you. This doesn’t sound like you.” That kind of invitation can help thaw some of the coldness that for all kinds of reasons perennially besets the human heart.